thedeadparrot (
thedeadparrot) wrote2013-12-15 11:01 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
so I got around to watching Man of Steel
I had a very fantabulous dinner + Man of Steel hatewatch last night. I knew the movie was going to be bad, but my anger was mollified by the good company and the delicious food.
I also went back and found my long rambling entries from, um, seven years ago, about Superman (and Batman) after Superman Returns and I was a much less jaded and bitter fangirl back then. I think Superman Returns has plenty of flaws (some of which are repeated in Man of Steel), but I still have some fondness for it, since it feels like a movie made with love. Man of Steel feels cold, for all that we get sad, angsty expressions from Henry Cavill. It doesn't feel calculated and commercial, but it does feel more like an intellectual exercise than an emotional one. I want my Superman movies to be filled with joy. Ripping off Terrence Malick in place of actual emotional depth will only get you so far.
Also, it would be more convincing as an intellectual exercise if anything made sense.
At least they didn't knock up Lois Lane with Superman's kid and then have him run out on her? Small mercies, man. Small mercies.
I also went back and found my long rambling entries from, um, seven years ago, about Superman (and Batman) after Superman Returns and I was a much less jaded and bitter fangirl back then. I think Superman Returns has plenty of flaws (some of which are repeated in Man of Steel), but I still have some fondness for it, since it feels like a movie made with love. Man of Steel feels cold, for all that we get sad, angsty expressions from Henry Cavill. It doesn't feel calculated and commercial, but it does feel more like an intellectual exercise than an emotional one. I want my Superman movies to be filled with joy. Ripping off Terrence Malick in place of actual emotional depth will only get you so far.
Also, it would be more convincing as an intellectual exercise if anything made sense.
At least they didn't knock up Lois Lane with Superman's kid and then have him run out on her? Small mercies, man. Small mercies.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
I think the movies both have a hard time understanding why Clark Kent, intrepid Daily Planet reporter, is important for modern retellings of the Superman story. The whole 'Clark Kent is a mask!' thing tends to be played in a dismissive manner, and it really limits the character, imo. I like the idea that it's possible that both Clark Kent and Superman are true to who he is, and the movies seem to always want to dismiss that out of hand.
no subject
There's no rewinding the clock, and it got changed within the first decade of his existence, but the Superman/Clark Kent of my heart is the inner city orphan who learned to use his superpowers leaping tall buildings rather than corn fields, and whose superheroics were an extension of his daily heroics as an investigative reporter who exposed corruption and injustice with his partner (who bravely investigated mobsters and other powerful figures without the protection of superpowers).
no subject