thedeadparrot (![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
thedeadparrot) wrote2005-01-18 10:01 pm
thedeadparrot) wrote2005-01-18 10:01 pm
GIP and random ranting.
Pseudo-epic Jack/Sloane is being evil. It's like all the canon revisions I made to Masters of War, except over a longer time frame and with less of a point.
GODDAMMIT, ALIAS. STOP BEING SO INCONSISTENT.
On another note, it was sunny and really, really cold today.
On yet another note, Jack is pretty hot for a guy older than my dad. Just sayin'
What I find interesting in all my travels reading the commentary about the show, is that the show's moral compass is kind of sketchy. It seems to revolve around who is on Sydney's "side". Jack does everything for Sydney so he's good. Sloane does nothing that much more reprehensible than what Jack does, but he's bad. I guess the line was much more clear cut in S1 with SD-6 as bad because it was a terrorist organization and the CIA was The Good Guys, but now? Not so much. Especially with Jack killing off random people for Sydney's benefit.
Brain hurts. Must go back to Bio.
GODDAMMIT, ALIAS. STOP BEING SO INCONSISTENT.
On another note, it was sunny and really, really cold today.
On yet another note, Jack is pretty hot for a guy older than my dad. Just sayin'
What I find interesting in all my travels reading the commentary about the show, is that the show's moral compass is kind of sketchy. It seems to revolve around who is on Sydney's "side". Jack does everything for Sydney so he's good. Sloane does nothing that much more reprehensible than what Jack does, but he's bad. I guess the line was much more clear cut in S1 with SD-6 as bad because it was a terrorist organization and the CIA was The Good Guys, but now? Not so much. Especially with Jack killing off random people for Sydney's benefit.
Brain hurts. Must go back to Bio.