liopleurodon: (Default)
liopleurodon ([personal profile] liopleurodon) wrote in [personal profile] thedeadparrot 2010-04-14 03:56 am (UTC)

God, thank you. I have been frustrated with the "feminism of Mary Sue" posts that are going around because most Mary Sues are so inherently sexist in their construction that I cannot understand this rampant defense of them. It seems to me that many of the pro-Mary Sue posts are completely misinterpreting the concept of a "Mary Sue." An original female character, even one who is completely self-insert, or vaguely self-insert, or a love interest for the male lead, is not inherently a Mary Sue. There is a lot more to Mary Sue-dom than that, and it has everything to do with the exaggeration of idealized and fetishized traits that society demands in a female. The traits that she is given that ostensibly undermine sexist hierarchies (her "power" traits) are equally fetishized by token of making her sexy via that very power. If she is a "strong woman" at all (a strength that is often undermined by a sexualized vulnerability), she is strong not for the virtue of being a strong woman, but for the purpose of being a strong woman who is therefore attractive to the male lead(s) (and everyone else).

Post a comment in response:

Identity URL: 
Account name:
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.


If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at

Notice: This account is set to log the IP addresses of everyone who comments.
Links will be displayed as unclickable URLs to help prevent spam.